Speaker: | Il-Chul Moon , KAIST |
When: | 2008-11-19 10:00
|
Place: | Room 308, Bldg 302, SNU |
Abstract
Destabilization of adversarial organizations is crucial to combating terrorism. The adversarial organizations are complex adaptive systems, which include different types of entities and links to perform complex tasks and evolve over-time to adapt to changing situations. Both the complexity and the adaptivity of the adversary make it difficult for friendly forces to destabilize the adversary and to damage the performance of the adversary’s organization. By taking a dynamic network analytic approach and focusing on how to identify, reason about, and break 1) the adversary’s decision making structure, 2) the likelihood that the adversary can engage in key tasks; and 3) the adversary’s over-time social and geospatial behavior, we can begin to make headway in reasoning about this complexity and adaptivity. I develop four different, interoperable approaches supporting this assessment and estimation on adversarial organizations. These four approaches analyze different aspects of an organization, i.e. the core decision making structure, the high level assessment of task completion likelihood and the micro level simulation of the behavior of adversaries. By unifying these approaches, we can grasp a complete picture of the target as well as the destabilization strategies against it. To ground and demonstrate this research, I use, primarily, three adversarial organizations, the terrorist networks responsible for 1998 US embassy bombing in Tanzania and Kenya; 1998 US embassy bombing in Kenya; and a global terrorist network. My research makes contribution at theoretical, technical and empirical levels. First, I provide a theory of how to create a joint picture from different organizational and computational theories. Second, I develop and test an interoperable analysis framework supported by the suggested joint theory. Third, I empirically analyze three adversarial organizations to demonstrate the usage of this framework and the newly enabled analysis results. This unifying theory and framework for adversarial destabilization, a partially automated intelligence analysis capability, 1) provide intelligence analysis results that can meet the operation tempo in the real world, 2) bridge dynamic network analysis and various inference theories, and 3) provide a better tool that human analysts may use to reduce their time and cost of destabilization analysis.
Short bio
Il-Chul Moon is a post-doctoral researcher at KAIST for his compulsory military service. He received his
Ph.D in Computation, Organization and Society from School of Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon
University in 2008; and his B.E. from Computer Science and Engineering at Seoul National University in
2004. His theoretic research focuses on the overlapping area of computer science, management, sociology
and operations research. His practical research includes military command and control analysis,
counterterrorism analysis, and intelligence analysis. His work was presented at various academic conferences,
journals as well as US DoD conferences, Westpoint seminars.
Resources
This will be shown to users with no Flash or Javascript.
|